There is a Secret About The New Google SERP

Wow, I never noticed it until now and I bet you didn’t either.  There is a secret message on the newish Google Search Engine Result Page.  Before I get to it, let me give you some hints.

Hint 1:  It is kinda like the FedEx Logo, but not in the logo.

Fed Ex Logo Arrow

See The Arrow

Hint 2: It is Subliminal Advertising

contrary to supraliminal stimuli or “above threshold”, are any sensory stimuli below an individual’s absolute threshold for conscious perception – Wikipedia

Any guesses?

Okay drum roll please….

Subliminal Advertising On GoogleStill don’t see it?  Let me Zoom and Enhance

Zoomed and Enhanced Google SERP PageAhhh, makes sense now “Google Everything

Posted in SEM | Leave a comment

Expired Domains – Side Effect of Google Caffeine

I almost feel like, I may be letting the cat out of the bag on this one. I am not a domainer nor do I pretend to be one, but as an SEO, I know how powerful the right domain can be. Just like in real estate, there are just only so many domains to go around. Anyways, in my travels last night I noticed a peculiar result in the SERPs.

As you can see it is a domain that is in the process of expiring and being put back into the wild. What is interesting here, is that it ranks well for a keyword phrase that has enough traffic that it is worth my time to go out and optimize for. So naturally my mind thinks hell I should try to purchase this domain for my client and 301 redirect it to their site. But this also gets me thinking, if there is one, there have to be more, right? But how many more.

If we do a simple search on Google – allintitle:”domain expired” we see that there are over 35,000 results. Now this is not a accurate number, but still, that is a lot of pages with that in the title. However, we do notice that there are other results that are not expired domains. I am lazy like the next guy, so I want to see more than just the standard 10 results so lets modify the search query to see 300 results at a time instead: “Expired Domains”

We have scroll all the way to the bottom of this list, but once we do we see that there are a whole bunch of results similar to the initial one I found. Google will only show you approximately the first 890 results, but that number of over 35,000 remains consistent even when we go back to the last page.

Now I now what you are thinking, did you find any other good domains when doing this?. Well I spent a little time doing some initial research into some of the domains, and there are some decent ones to potentially grab.

One I found was: www.blizzconsweepstakes.com – This appears to be somewhat of an official site and would probably be good for some WOW affiliate sites. According to Open Site Explorer its a decent site.

Another one that seemed promising was: anseattle.org – This was a site that has some medical related links, so it would probably be great for all of the scammers and spammers out there. According to Open Site Explorer the site has even more Domain Authority than the previous one.

Happy Domain Hunting

Posted in SEO | Leave a comment

Nostradamofe.Corp.Google.com

What is this. I went to the external keyword tool and I was presented with the following. I have no idea what it is, but it doesn’t let me go any further. Very interesting. Also, I was not allowed to go back to the legacy style keyword tool. There was no option for that. Maybe this is some new tool to come, but what is this ‘improved backend (Nostradamo). If you know what it is please let me know in the comments or @janesvilleseo

UPDATE: As of 8:00am CST on 6/23/10 I no longer have access to this Nostradamo page, I am now back to the normal Google External Keyword Tool.

Nostradamo Google's Improved Backend

Posted in SEO | 7 Comments

Importance of Reviews on Google LBC

So just how important are reviews on Google Local Business Center Listings?  Short Answer: Very.  Now for the long winded answer.

There is a general consensus that reviews are very important.  According to David Mihm’s Local Search Ranking Factors 2009 Report in which 26 Industry Veterans were surveyed the following results were reported:

The scale was from -5 (can hurt your rankings / lead to a penalty) to 5 (very important to ranking well) with 0 (not having an impact on your rankings).

  • General Importance of Customer Reviews 3.27 (high importance)
  • Volume of Customer Reviews: 3.34 (high importance)
  • Customer Reviews on 3rd Party Websites: 2.30 (moderate importance)
  • Positive Ratings Associated with Reviews: 3.34 (low importance)

These results are not at all surprising especially if you have been in the Local SEO world for any given length of time.  However, since I live in a relatively SEO virgin town of Janesville, WI the local SEO I provide tends to have an immediate and influential effect on the search engine result pages.

A Little Local SEO Backstory:

One of my current projects has been developing and marketing a website on a shoestring (read Free) budget for my Mother-In-Law who lives here in Janesville.  She had absolutely no presence online so its been quite the adventure for me.  I literally built the entire website and launched it over a single weekend and it has been live for about 5 months.  The reason I took this task on was that she runs a local daycare here in town and had some openings coming up.  Normally she advertises in the paper and puts up fliers, but she was not getting any response plus the fliers were being taken down.  And in case you are wondering, she has obtained new business because of the website, which is pretty fantastic since its only been a few months.

So why am I telling you all this?  Simply because of the following Search Engine Result Page: Best Daycare in Janesville WI

In just a few short months, I have helped Google deliver her website up as the most relevant for that search term.  I had no intention of having that happen.  I was not even gunning for that term, since there is little to no search volume.  But to me it exemplifies the importance of having reviews within Google Local Business Center.  She is the top organic result shown for this term, she is the only one with a map result which commands most of the above the fold real estate, and she also shows up again further down the page.

How did this happen?

Well there are few factors that went into obtaining this result.  The first one was rather obvious; the review on the local business center listing itself.  If you haven’t figured it out yet, that review was put there by me.  I put it there because my son does attend her daycare so it is a truthful review.  But you will notice more importantly that the first line of the review says “By far this is the best daycare in Janesville”  So it is safe to assume that the text in the review itself is playing a role in ranking for this keyword.

Another factor that played into this is the content on the site itself.  She, under my advise, has started to obtain testimonials of parents who have had children in her daycare.  To start things off, my wife and I provided the first testimonial.  It is featured on the homepage as well as the testimonials page.  That testimonial says “Care-A-Lot Family Daycare is by far the best and most affordable daycare available in Janesville.”

Lastly the other item that may have played a role into rankings could have been that the review on the local business center was found “helpful by 1 out of 1 people”.  So this helped to give affirmation that it is truthful and correct.

How can you use this to your benefit?

If you live in a virgin SEO town like me, then you can quite easily implement the same strategy as I haphazardly stumbled across.  But what if you live in a larger more competitive town?  Then you just need to attack it and obtain more of everything that I outlined above.  I can only imagine what other terms you could implement and rank well for that include a map result.  This could be, if used correctly, a way to dominate and control search engine result page real estate.  Imagine having 20, 30, or more different results that obtain a 1 pack result.  This could be quite powerful especially on local branding.  And if you are evil you could possibly do the opposite and get 1 pack results for “worst <blank> in <city> <state>”.  I don’t advise doing that, but i can imagine it happening.

Last Local SEO Thought

As I was writing this one thought that came to mind that I am pretty sure is being used in some fashion but was not talked about in the 2009 Local SEO guide was the geolocation of the reviewer to the review.  I can certainly imagine Google using the location of the reviewer as a factor in the validity of the review.  If you were to review a business that was hyper local in its service nature and/or did not provide service in the area from which the reviewer wrote the review it would most certainly not seem to be a credible review.  As an example lets say someone wrote a review from Florida about buying a house from a real estate agent in California.  While that can certainly happen, it doesn’t seem as real / honest as if it came from the same city that the real estate agent was located in.

Posted in Google Local Business Center | Leave a comment

Google Suggest SEO is…Easy?!?

google suggest seo is

Google Suggest SEO is...

I feel a little special.  Well at least I am going to take credit for it.  Although I know it just couldn’t have been little old me who did it.  What am I talking about?  Well I am talking about influencing Google Suggest results.

At the end of January I wrote a piece about the hand job for “SEO is” on Google Suggest.  In that article I referenced the picture you see to the left.  In it you can clearly see that results are a little skewed to the negative side of SEO to say the least.  Additionally I came to the ultimate conclusion that the suggested searches did not seem to equal what was being searched for.  On top of that I also said the following:

We can check that by doing a search for “seo is bullshit“, ~389,00o results, or more precisely “allintitle:seo is bullshit“, ~217 results.  So there are sites in their index with these keywords.  But to counter, a search for “allintitle:seo is easy” has ~3570 results, and has a 36 for Global Monthly Search Volume.  So why is “seo is bullshit” in the suggestion and not “seo is easy.”

Google Suggest SEO is Easy

Google Suggest SEO is Easy

In that post I called out why “SEO is Easy” deserved, on all accounts, to be in the suggested searches.  Well, today I feel as though I have some small power over Google, or rather maybe just some psychic abilities.  Take a look at the screen grab to the right.  Do you see what I see? Yep. That very last result says “SEO is Easy”.  I did it,  I put that there, well, I like to think I did.  And at the very same time I did my part help our community by getting one negative suggestion out: “SEO is Snake Oil”.

No need to thank me my fellow SEOs and SEMs ;)   Google Suggest fascinates me to say the least.  I think I am going to be spending more and more time digging into it.

Posted in SEO | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Snake Oil In My Own Backyard

I know that they are out there, but I didn’t know that they were right next door.  What am I talking about exactly?  Well, let me tell you the story that brought me to this slap in the face statement.

It all started with an email.  The email was addressed to me from my father.  He sent me a listing on Craigslist about a person who needed some basic SEO help.  I normally don’t cruise Craigslist, but this email peaked my interest as to what else may be out there.  There wasn’t too much of anything else, except I  came across this listing: http://milwaukee.craigslist.org/sls/1592964195.html For those who don’t want to read it or it gets removed, here it is in all its glory:

We are a brick and mortar 11 year old web design company located in Oconomowoc, WI, and build hundreds of websites every year here in WI. For the last few years we have been developing our own SEO (search engine optimization) system. We have developed a way to get ANY business on the FIRST PAGE of Google (ORGANICALLY) for ANY SEARCH TERM within 11-14 days and for a FRACTION of what other SEO companies charge. When we show a company what we do, they literally sign themselves up for our program.

So, we have finally decided to launch our program and are looking for 2-3 sharp people to train to sell our program. We expect the people we chose to earn somewhere around $300 – $600 / day….starting within the very first week. Now although this is a commission job, we are willing to offer the right person(s) a salary after 30 days of proving yourself. (although you’ll tell us to stuff it because that would be taking a pay cut) But we will offer it anyway. :-)

The right person(s) will have some sales in their background, a good knowledge of the internet, good phone and speaking skills and a positive attitude.

If you are interested in learning more, please send your resume’ with job history and we will call you to schedule an in person interview here in our Oconomowoc office. Once you see what we’re doing and how fast it works…..you won’t sleep thinking about all the money you’ll be making.

This is all inside sales here in our office. Our office and dress code is RELAXED CASUAL, and the work hours are 8am – 5pm.

We look forward to speaking with you.

I am sure that you are as annoyed as I am after reading that.  This is a posting for a Sales Position at that company and they are making some outrageous claims.  Those claims are all centered around this sentence:

We have developed a way to get ANY business on the FIRST PAGE of Google (ORGANICALLY) for ANY SEARCH TERM within 11-14 days and for a FRACTION of what other SEO companies charge.

They haven’t developed shit, Period!  Because if they did, why would it be at a Fraction of what other SEO companies charge.  It doesn’t make any logical sense.  Really, lets think about it.  If you knew how to get ANY Keyword on Page 1 with in 11-14 days, would charge pennies for it.  I don’t think so.  I would charge whatever I wanted because I could command the price its worth.

I just wished they included the actual company in their ad or an example of just how awesome there system is.  While I am at it.  I came across this ad on Craigslist as well http://janesville.craigslist.org/cps/1601277441.html.

This guy, Matt as he calls himself, doesn’t seem too bad at first, except for guaranteeing Page 1 results.  This, as we know, is a red flag to anybody worth their salt in the SEO field.  The reason I say not too bad is because he actually appears to give you the exact places where he does his link building.

However, if we do a little bit more digging, we see that things start to fall apart.  All you have to do is go to his website (just click on the ad because I am not linking straight to him) and go to his results page.  But before that, can you believe that this Matt guy has his whole site in Flash and he calls himself some sort of SEO expert.  As for the results, they are just not that spectacular.

Why is that? Well, even though he removes the keyword from the search box, we can deduce what his search query was based on the words in bold in the results.  The first one seems to be for Chicago Lawn Care or Lawn Care Chicago.  I could go into all of the keyword research to see if this is a difficult keyword, but Mat has already done that by calling out the number of results.  I repeat, he called out the number of results as his evidence for victory.  People please, don’t do that.  It is not a measure for how difficult or competitive the keyword is.

I know that there are all levels of quality service in every profession out there, but when it hits this close to home it hurts just a little bit more.  Not only does the company I work for have to compete against these Snake Oil Salesmen, local companies and their employees will be hurt by them.  I guess that it is no surprise they don’t say what their company name is in the ad, but I wish it did so I could call their bullshit out to their face!

</rant>

Posted in SEM | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Google Suggest Seo Is…?

google suggest seo is

Google Suggest SEO is...

It came to my attention yesterday from a coworker that I should type into Google the following “SEO is”.  And to my <sarcasm>shock</sarcasm> we got the results you see in the picture to the right.  In case you are unable to see the picture I will list them:

  • SEO is bullshit
  • SEO is dead
  • SEO is a scam
  • SEO is a Joke
  • SEO is useless
  • SEO issues
  • SEO is overrated
  • SEO is bs
  • SEO is snake oil

Like many of you I took offense to this and started to wonder how these are the ones being suggested and where are the coming from.  First according to Google:

If you’re signed in to your Google Account and have Web History enabled, suggestions are drawn from searches you’ve done, searches done by users all over the world, sites in our search index, and ads in our advertising network. If you’re not signed in to your Google Account, no history-based suggestions are displayed.

So they say it comes from my history and the  searches I have done previously.  I can attest that I have not looked for any of those, except in the past with a recent article about ‘”SEO is Dead.”

The next part indicates that they come from searches done all over the world.  Well let see if that statement holds water by checking Google’s Keyword Tool.

If we search for “seo is” we get the following results with global broad match search volume:

  • search engine optimization seo is the: Not Enough Data
  • search engine optimization seo is the process: 46
  • seo is like: 22
  • seo is: 12,100
  • seo is a scam: 46
  • seo is dead: 170

Well there are at least two of the results, ‘seo is a scam’ and ‘seo is dead’.  But what about the rest.  Even looking through the rest of the “additional keywords to consider” we do not find any of the others listed.  The next logical step is to look for the exact terms to see what the tool indicates for estimated volume.  We get the following results for global broad match:

  • SEO is bullshit: 46
  • SEO is dead: 170
  • SEO is a scam: 46
  • SEO is a Joke: Not Enough Data
  • SEO is useless: Not Enough Data
  • SEO issues: 320
  • SEO is overrated: Not Enough Data
  • SEO is bs: Not Enough Data
  • SEO is snake oil: Not Enough Data

Okay so there are a couple more that contain some search traffic, “SEO Issues” and “SEO is Bullshit”.  This still does not complete the list.  Okay maybe these are keywords that are trending up right now so let us take a look at Google Insight Trends.

If we do a search in Google Insights for Search for “seo is” we get the following breakout rising searches

  • why seo
  • seo is dead

Now I am not surprised at all with these results, if we remember there was a lot of recent activity about the “SEO is Dead” topic.  But, once again, we do not see any references for the other keyword suggestions.  To add insult to injury if we do a worldwide search for the term “seo is bullshit” we get “Not enough search volume to show graphs”.  Wow, there just doesn’t seem to be people out there searching for these terms.

Google indicates that they come from ads in their ad network.  Now this one is harder to check, but if I do a search for these keywords, I should see some adds in theory, Right?  Well here are the results of that experiment:

  • SEO is bullshit: No Ads
  • SEO is dead: No Ads
  • SEO is a scam: Ads
  • SEO is a Joke: No Ads
  • SEO is useless: No Ads
  • SEO issues: No Ads
  • SEO is overrated: No Ads
  • SEO is bs: Ads
  • SEO is snake oil: No Ads

The last piece indicates that they come from sites in their index.  Well that is true, there are sites in their index.  We can check that by doing a search for “seo is bullshit“, ~389,00o results, or more precisely “allintitle:seo is bullshit“, ~217 results.  So there are sites in their index with these keywords.  But to counter, a search for “allintitle:seo is easy” has ~3570 results, and has a 36 for Global Monthly Search Volume.  So why is “seo is bullshit” in the suggestion and not “seo is easy.”

So where on earth are these suggestions coming from.  My hunch is they are hand selected.  I can neither confirm nor deny and nor can Google, but it is my story and I am sticking to it.

Posted in SEO | Tagged , , | 3 Comments

What Google’s Suggest A Link Really Means

Google's Suggest A Link in Action

Google's Suggest A Link in Action

This may be old news to most, but Google has been for quite some time now adding actual results/links inside the search box. This is seen only on the main homepage of Google and not yet applied to iGoogle. They also provide adds within that same suggestion field, but through my testing lately I was unable to find any. They may be removing them due to unfair advantage that these may give to those lucky enough to get within that search box.

Since I am have not come across the ads as of late, I am not going to comment on those for this post, but just so we are clear, Google still says they include ads in there. However, this post is going to try to take a look at some of the implications that this has on SEM and the general populace at large.

The Good

One thing that is good by providing these straight links within the search box is a cut down on the searches done for a company name. As in the example on the left for CNN, we know the individual is looking more than likely for cnn.com. So instead of wasting my time and Google’s time by providing a long list of search engine results, we are provided the opportunity to click straight on the result.

Why do I call it a “straight link”? The reason I call it a straight link, is because it really is. I took a look at the referral and http header information using a tool like Live HTTP Headers for Firefox we can see that it is a normal link. There is no 302 redirect that is applied as within a typical search results page. Now I am not fortunate enough to have a site that meets the algorithmic guidelines to be granted a suggest a link in the search box, but would be curious to see how this shows up in my analytic reports. Would this be a referral and not a search engine visit? As a side note, you can also tell from the header information that they are tracking and testing this. There are callouts for “source-suggest” and “oi=suggest_nav”.

Another positive that this provides for those who are lucky enough to be in there is going to be reduced amount of competitors being able to bid on brand related keywords and stealing market share. With its current state the amount of any reduction would be small since the amount of links that populate the suggest a link is extremely small and does not even attempt long tail keywords.

Another positive is for Online PR Management. If there are any results that would normally show up in the SERPs that would impact that company negatively for those large brand related search terms, then they would be avoided since the lions share of searchers would simply click on the suggest a link that Google provides.

The Bad

If we take the notion from the previous paragraph about the reduction in brand related campaigns from competitors and look at from the perspective of the competitors then this is a bad thing. If the amount of suggest a links grow, then the amount of keywords that competitors can bid on will be reduced. But realistically, this is a small threat and not a true concern.

fiver-google-suggest-a-linkAnother negative facet to this is that it only favors those with larger amounts of traffic. Since this is dependent on an algorithm to decide when and when not to provide a link, those websites that have a huge amount of traffic will be graced with a suggest a link. This can be seen in the example at the left. By combing information from Google trends we can get a clearer idea that back in early 2008 “fiver” really took off, but it has yet to beat out “fiver tv”

How to Get A Google Suggest A Link

I really am not sure how to get a link and there is really no sure fire way to get one, unless you are already huge. The best answer is that you just need to market the hell out of your company and with large traffic comes a Google suggest-a-link. However, the example to the left seems to indicate a few of the needed requirements in order to get one. There seems to be only one keyword that can be the trigger for each page. In the case to the left it is the homepage. I say page because if you start typing in ‘New York Times Best Seller List” you get a link to the interior page of nytimes.com. Also, I am pretty sure that this is dependent on Google’s knowledge of click through rates and bounce rates since these are the only metrics that would decide if a keyword would be graced with a suggest a link.

My question is what is the cut off for this click through and bounce rate. Do you need to have a 95% click through rate plus a bounce rate of 15% or lower?. I have to assume the cut off is fairly high since the cut off for Google’s Website Optimizer is also high. Needs to be around 98% sure that it will beat the original to indicate a winner.

Little Changes Make a Big Difference

Once again Google has made a small change, but the impact is big.  These types of changes can really mean a significant change to the way things are done in the search world.  The best part of it all is that Google continually tests these changes to see not only what the impact is, but also how big the impact is.  I just wish sometimes that I could see the results from these tests.

Posted in Uncategorized | 3 Comments

Janesville SEO is Now On Twitter

I thought it was about time to join the twitterevolution.  I am signed up on twitter @janesvilleseo.  I am also, currently experimenting with a TwitterTools.

Seamless Blog and Twitter Integration

Twitter Tools claims to have a seamless integration between your blog and your twitter feed.  All I can say so far that it installed really easily and I only had to supply my twitter user-name and password to connect.  It is now up and running with this post being the first auto tweet.  Twitter Tools provides a lot more features then just auto tweeting from a blog post.  You can also do the reverse and create a blog post from a tweet.  Not sure if I am going to need that feature on this blog, but it may come in handy a few for one down the road I am working on.  Another feature is the ability to create daily and weekly digest posts from your tweets.  This may come in handy here on Janesvilleseo.com.  That is if I end up tweeting a whole lot.  And of course the last feature is the ability to incorporate your tweets on your blog.

Only time will tell if this plugin is worth its weight, but I have a sneaking suspicion that it will be more than worth it.

Posted in SEM | Leave a comment

Name Server Propagation Delay

I am currently working a personal SEM project for a family member and I am about to rip my hair out waiting for the name servers to update throughout the world. 

A Little Back Story

The family friend is self employed and is in need of a web site to help promote their services.  Being the great person that I am I decide that I am going to build them a simple website, hosting, and the domain name to boot.  I finally got enough done to go live with the site, but the name servers are taking their sweet time.  I put in the for name server change on Saturday afternoon.  It is currently 10pm on Tuesday.  They say that it takes up to 72 hours for these things to get done, so technically, I have till tomorrow.  The last website I had to do this for, this site, took a lot less time and I even had to do it twice.  The documentation was not updated with the correct info.

I will have to keep my fingers crossed until then.  But, in the mean time I found a great online tool, Whatsmydns.net, to help me keep track of the progress of the Name Server Propagation.  Its a free tool that allows you to track a bunch of different DNS info about a domain as it exists in various servers around the world.

I will keep you all posted as to when the new site is finally up and running.

Posted in SEM Projects | 2 Comments